Universal Health Care and Adoption

“Family first”, huh?

When you start filling out your paperwork for adoption, one of the questions you have to cover is .. what health care do you have and how quickly can your baby be added to your health care?

I started wondering how many adoptive parents worry about providing health care for their children. We don’t have insurance. I’ve never cared for our health care system so I don’t take part in it. Of course, a baby has a whole new set of needs (and the state requires it) so I began researching health care.


I can barely understand what’s covered and what’s not covered (I’ve been to graduate school so I PROMISE I can read and comprehend things, but … ) and the cost was RIDICULOUS! I was getting quotes of between $400 and $900 for all three of us. Um .. what the hell? Now all the debates on the news about medical costs made sense. People are having to choose whether to see a doctor or buy food. Disgusting.

I’ve always been all for universal medical care because it just seemed to make sense. If every American could be covered by us all paying a bit more per year then I’m all for it. It was more of an intellectual debate than an emotional one, but I still agreed with it on its face. Now, this has become personal.

I came across a “die-hard conservative Republican” that shared her story of moving to Canada and changing her mind about universal medical coverage. She writes better than I do so I’m pasting some of her story below. Check out the whole piece at Permission to Live.

Fast forward a little past the Canadian births of my third and fourth babies. I had better prenatal care than I had ever had in the States. I came in regularly for appointments to check on my health and my babies’ health throughout my pregnancy, and I never had to worry about how much a test cost or how much the blood draw fee was. I didn’t have to skip my ultrasound because of the expense. With my pregnancies in the States, I had limited my checkups to only a handful to keep costs down. When I went in to get the shot I needed because of my negative blood type, in Canada it was covered. In fact I got the recommended 2 doses instead of the more risky 1 dose because I didn’t have to worry about the expense. I had a wide array of options and flexibility when it came to my birth, and care providers that were more concerned with my health and the health of my baby than how much money they might make based on my birth, or what might impact their reputation best. When health care is universal, doctors are free to recommend and provide the best care for every patient instead of basing their care on what each patient can afford.


I found out that religious rights were still respected. The Catholic hospital in the area did not provide abortions, and they were not required too. I had an amazing medically safe birth, and excellent post-natal care with midwives who had to be trained, certified and approved by the medical system.

I started to feel differently about Universal government mandated and regulated Health care. I realized how many times my family had avoided hospital care because of our lack of coverage. When I mentioned to Canadians that I had been in a car accident as a teen and hadn’t gone into the hospital, they were shocked! Here, you always went to the hospital, just in case. And the back pain I had endured ever since would have been investigated and cared for with whatever X-rays, Physiotherapy or even Surgery that was needed, which would have been at no cost to me. In our particular province, even chiropractic care was provided after a car accident by the provincial care insurance.When I asked for prayers for my little brother who had been burned in an accident, they were all puzzled why the story did not include immediately rushing him to the hospital. When they asked me to clarify and I explained that many people in the States are not insured and they try to put off medical care unless absolutely needed, they literally could not comprehend such a thing.

I also discovered that the Canadian government looked out for its families in other ways. The country mandates one year of paid maternity leave, meaning a woman having a baby gets an entire year after the birth of her baby to recover and parent her new baby full-time, while still receiving 55% of her salary and her job back at the end of that year. Either parent can use the leave, so some split it, with one parent staying at home for 6 months and the other staying at home for 6 months. I could hardly believe my ears when I first heard it. In America, women routinely had to return to work after 6 weeks leave, many times unpaid. Many American women lost their jobs when becoming pregnant or having a baby. I knew people who had to go back to work 2 weeks after giving birth just to hang onto their job and continue making enough money to pay the bills. Also every child in Canada gets a monthly cash tax benefit. The wealthier families can put theirs into a savings account to pay for college someday (which also costs far less money in Canada by the way), the not so wealthy can use theirs to buy that car seat or even groceries. In the province we lived in, we also received a monthly day care supplement check for every child under school age. I made more money being a stay at home mom in Canada than I do in the States working a part-time close to a minimum wage job. And none of the things I listed here are considered “welfare” they are available to every Canadian regardless of income. For those with lower incomes than we had there are other supports in place as well.

If a woman gets pregnant unexpectedly in America, she has to worry about how she will get her own prenatal care, medical care for her child, whether or not she will be able to keep her job and how she will pay for daycare for her child so she can continue to support her family. In Canada those problems are eliminated or at least reduced. Where do you think a woman is more likely to feel supported in her decision to keep her baby, and therefore reduce abortions?

I would like to steal her whole post, but that would be wrong. So please, please, pretty please to go to her blog to read the rest.



One thought on “Universal Health Care and Adoption

  1. Are you telling the insurance companies that you’re going to adopt a child? Because the insurance companies we talked to say that adopting a child makes a person an expectant parent, and therefore, uninsurable. In fact, my husband was turned down by two companies for being an expectant father. I can’t get private health insurance because I have a pre-existing condition.

    As for companies, try HealthNet. They’re the one I liked the best. You’re lucky to be quoted $400-$900 for all 3 of you. That’s very low. My son’s insurance with Cigna was $210 per month. Cigna wanted over $300 per month to insure just my daughter. With HealthNet, she was just over $100 per month.

    Fortunately, my husband found a job that offers health benefits, so I have real health insurance for the first time since our COBRA ran out in 2010.

    I definitely think health and maternity care have a lot to do with adoption here. If you can’t afford health insurance, but you don’t make little enough to be covered by the state, I imagine you’ll feel more inclined to place your child with someone who can make sure he/she is taken care of if he/she becomes ill. If your job doesn’t offer maternity leave, how are you supposed to support and care for your child?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s